Track how ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode answer for your brand — country by country, city by city, prompt by prompt. Find the markets and cities where a competitor is the answer and you are not, and close the gap.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode name a handful of brands and move on. GEO Bubbles asks them the questions your customers ask, from the cities your customers are in, on a schedule — and tells you when the name they give is not yours.
Set the prompts once and the platform re-asks every engine on your schedule. Each run is a fresh reading, stored, comparable, and dated — so a drop has a day next to it.
Curate the questions that actually decide a purchase in your industry, in the language each market uses. Harvest them from Search Console, or generate them and edit down.
Every answer is checked for who was named. When a competitor appears and you do not, that prompt becomes a gap — attached to a city, an engine, and a date.
Not "improve your content". A content type, a city, the prompts it would answer, and the expected lift on that city's AI Score.



Your prompts go to ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode from an IP in the target country. We keep the whole answer — the text, the brands named, the position, the sources cited — not just a score.
The same brand can be the obvious answer in Munich and invisible in Leipzig. A national average hides the one thing you could actually fix this quarter.
Competitor mentions are tracked on the same prompts. You get share of voice, mention rate and average position for you and for them, per city and per engine.
Recommendations say which content type answers which prompts. Publish it, and the next scheduled run tells you whether the engines picked it up.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode, scored separately before anything is averaged. They disagree with each other far more often than people expect, and the disagreement is usually the insight.
Answers are collected as if asked from the city itself. Munich, Berlin and Zurich get their own readings — and their own bubble on the map.
Every brand named in an answer is recorded, not only the ones you listed. Competitors you did not know you had show up in the data before they show up in your pipeline.
The AI Visibility Score combines mention rate, position and share of voice into a number you can put in a board deck — with the three components still visible underneath it.
The map is the front door. Behind it is the view your team works in every week — and the one your CFO asks for once a quarter.
No feature gates, no AI-provider add-ons, no "contact sales" to find out whether competitor tracking is included. It is. What you pick is how many countries, prompts and sites you need.
For independent businesses and single-location brands — the geographic intelligence without the cost of a tool built for multi-brand operators.
For growing brands running a portfolio of country sites — the tier where geography stops being one map pin and starts being a strategy.
For international brands spanning continents — the consolidated view an in-house team or an agency partner needs to make search decisions at scale.
Every tool in this category will hand you a list of prompts. Most of that list is synthetic — plausible-sounding questions produced from a category name, disconnected from your business and from the people who actually buy from you. Track those and you learn how visible you are for questions nobody asks. PromptDNA starts at the other end: with research.
Before a single prompt is written, a research agent works out what you sell, to whom, in which markets, in which language, and what people already come to you for. It aggregates five sources you already own:
Reads the business before it writes anything. Output: a site profile, not a keyword list.
Drafts the questions a real customer in that market would type, in the language they would type them — phrased the way people phrase things when they are close to buying.
Reads the profile and the current spread across the funnel, then recommends where to add weight and which content answers it.
Prompts are classified across the customer journey. That turns one visibility number into four, and makes an obvious question answerable: are we invisible to people who have never heard of us, or to people who are comparing us right now?
The question asked before anyone knows you exist.
Comparing the options, narrowing the shortlist.
Ready to act, deciding where to go.
Support, renewal, and the answers that earn a recommendation.
Every agent is specialised, trained on its own material and limited to its own job. Nothing an agent writes reaches your site without passing a second agent that runs on a different model — and then a person.
They also work as a crew. Agents hand work to each other, watch each other's output and step in when something looks off: the Brand Monitor Agent checks every claim against your brand guidelines, the Watch Agent reports what actually changed after a publish, and the Site Profile Agent is the only source of facts the others may use. No agent acts unchecked — and every check lands in the Agent Log you can watch on the map above.
Every agent starts with an onboarding training on your own material: your cities and services, your pages and the facts on them, your brand's tone and voice, the claims you must never make, and the rules of your industry. That is how it understands the context before it writes a single word.
Then comes a calibration run. On a first batch of real uncited prompts and content briefs the agents draft everything — and nothing is published. You approve or decline each piece and, where something is not as expected, say why: too promotional, wrong term, never quote a waiting time, not how we talk about price in Denmark. Every decision feeds the agent's next learning round, and the confidence shown next to a draft is calibrated on exactly this feedback. The more detail you give, the faster the drafts sound like you — the agents are eager to learn ;-)

Reads the business before anything else does, and builds the profile every other agent works from.

Turns the gap between the prompts people ask and the answers you appear in into a ranked list of moves.

Watches the engines for the changes you did not cause — the ones nobody can catch by hand across every city.

Catches the answers that describe your brand wrong — then traces the claim back to the page that caused it.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode, each scored on its own before anything is averaged.
Answers vary run to run. Every prompt is asked repeatedly so the number is a reading, not a lucky draw.
No engine publishes one. Everyone in this category is inferring from answers — we would rather say so.
Nobody can buy a citation. What you can do is remove the reasons you are not cited.
Every tracked prompt is re-asked weekly, so a change shows up in days rather than months. Add a prompt and it runs within 15 minutes — you are not waiting for the next cycle.
A rank tracker tells you where a page sits in a list. An answer engine does not show a list — it names two or three brands in a sentence. We measure whether one of them is you, in which position, and what the model cited when it decided.
By asking repeatedly and reporting the spread. Each prompt is put to each engine several times per run, from the right country, and the score is the result across those runs. Variance is shown, not smoothed away.
No, and nobody can. There is no paid placement and no ranking API in any of these engines. What we can do is find the prompts where you are absent, show what the model cited instead, and tell you what to publish.
Not to measure. Measuring needs your brand, your cities and your prompts. Search Console is a read-only connection you can revoke, and publishing a recommendation is something you do in your own CMS.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode today, on a schedule you set. More engines are added as their answers become stable enough to measure honestly.
Yes. Prompts, collected answers and the whole history stay in your workspace and export at any time. Nothing is sold or pooled.
One running log of every update that moves answers, with the dates you need to annotate your own charts.
TechnicalCrawlability, structure and speed decide whether a model can quote you at all.
PlanningA single board for prompts, markets, content and owners — free to use.
ProductThe full walkthrough, from the prompt library to the competitor quadrant.